Stylesheet style.css not found, please contact the developer of "arctic" template.
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision |
| archeometry_14c_dendrochronology_thermoluminescence_etc [2015/01/14 10:32] – maciej | archeometry_14c_dendrochronology_thermoluminescence_etc [2016/04/17 11:31] (current) – [Radiocarbon dating of Mesopotamian materials] dahl |
|---|
| |
| ==== Introduction ==== | ==== Introduction ==== |
| | |
| |
| **Radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) dating** introduced by Arnold and Libby (1949) was one of the most significant leaps in the history of archaeology, history and the history of art. This technique allows scientists to estimate the absolute date of death of any organism. Using the isotopic ratios of the radioactive carbon-14 and stable carbon-12 in the organism’s tissues and comparing it to the ratio in Earth’s atmosphere permits to calculate how long it was since the organism stopped exchanging carbon with its surrounding. Further developments in the field included the introduction of the **calibration process** in order to account for the fluctuations of the <sup>14</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C ratio in the atmosphere through time, and the use of **mass spectrometry (MS)** to arrive at more precise measurements using smaller samples (Bayliss 2009). The most recent important addition to the <sup>14</sup>C dating methodology is the use of **Bayesian modelling** (Bronk Ramsey 2009) - a series of statistical tools which help to incorporate additional information (e.g. archaeological, historical, textual) into the absolute chronology, effectively reducing the errors of the radiocarbon dates. | **Radiocarbon (<sup>14</sup>C) dating** introduced by Arnold and Libby (1949) was one of the most significant leaps in the history of archaeology, history and the history of art. This technique allows scientists to estimate the absolute date of death of any organism. Using the isotopic ratios of the radioactive carbon-14 and stable carbon-12 in the organism’s tissues and comparing it to the ratio in Earth’s atmosphere permits to calculate how long it was since the organism stopped exchanging carbon with its surrounding. Further developments in the field included the introduction of the **calibration process** in order to account for the fluctuations of the <sup>14</sup>C/<sup>12</sup>C ratio in the atmosphere through time, and the use of **mass spectrometry (MS)** to arrive at more precise measurements using smaller samples (Bayliss 2009). The most recent important addition to the <sup>14</sup>C dating methodology is the use of **Bayesian modelling** (Bronk Ramsey 2009) - a series of statistical tools which help to incorporate additional information (e.g. archaeological, historical, textual) into the absolute chronology, effectively reducing the errors of the radiocarbon dates. |
| * The nature of the **material** has significant impact on the reliability of the radiocarbon date. **Short-lived** plants and textiles (twigs, textiles etc.) and bones are more likely to produce precise and accurate absolute dates than long-lived materials (e.g. shells, wood) or charcoal. | * The nature of the **material** has significant impact on the reliability of the radiocarbon date. **Short-lived** plants and textiles (twigs, textiles etc.) and bones are more likely to produce precise and accurate absolute dates than long-lived materials (e.g. shells, wood) or charcoal. |
| * **Plateaus in the calibration curve**, i.e. periods of increased production of <sup>14</sup>C in the Earth’s atmosphere, can cause the errors of the radiocarbon dates to increase drastically, obscuring the absolute chronology. One such period occurred during the Early Dynastic era, between ca. 2820-2580 BC (Reimer et al. 2012). This problem can only be alleviated with the production of new radiocarbon dates. | * **Plateaus in the calibration curve**, i.e. periods of increased production of <sup>14</sup>C in the Earth’s atmosphere, can cause the errors of the radiocarbon dates to increase drastically, obscuring the absolute chronology. One such period occurred during the Early Dynastic era, between ca. 2820-2580 BC (Reimer et al. 2012). This problem can only be alleviated with the production of new radiocarbon dates. |
| | |
| | [[14C Dates from Mesopotamia]] |
| |
| ===== Dendrochronology ===== | ===== Dendrochronology ===== |
