Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
| ugaritic [2012/07/12 12:52] – [The Writing System] hawkins | ugaritic [2015/01/07 11:02] (current) – [The Writing System] hawkins | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| ͗a b g ḫ d h w z ḥ ṭ y k š l | ͗a b g ḫ d h w z ḥ ṭ y k š l | ||
| + | |||
| The last letter, ś, is rare and usually only occurs in loanwords (such as śśw from Indo-European ‘horse’) but can also interchange with s. It has been posited that ś represents s plus long or short /u/, in other words su or sū (Huehnergard 2002, 1). Another theory is that ś represents the evolution of the phoneme s, corresponding to Hebrew samekh, where the former expressed an affricate when the later had become, or was in the process of becoming, a fricative (Pardee 2007, 183; Tropper 1995, 505-528). | The last letter, ś, is rare and usually only occurs in loanwords (such as śśw from Indo-European ‘horse’) but can also interchange with s. It has been posited that ś represents s plus long or short /u/, in other words su or sū (Huehnergard 2002, 1). Another theory is that ś represents the evolution of the phoneme s, corresponding to Hebrew samekh, where the former expressed an affricate when the later had become, or was in the process of becoming, a fricative (Pardee 2007, 183; Tropper 1995, 505-528). | ||
| Line 65: | Line 66: | ||
| Tropper, J. 1995. “Die letzte Zeichen des ugaritischen Alphabets.” // | Tropper, J. 1995. “Die letzte Zeichen des ugaritischen Alphabets.” // | ||
| + | |||
| + | Tropper, J. 2000. // | ||
| Walker, C.B.F. 1990. " | Walker, C.B.F. 1990. " | ||
